Robbins v. Robbins

29 S.W.2d 278, 181 Ark. 1105, 1930 Ark. LEXIS 381
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJune 23, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 29 S.W.2d 278 (Robbins v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robbins v. Robbins, 29 S.W.2d 278, 181 Ark. 1105, 1930 Ark. LEXIS 381 (Ark. 1930).

Opinion

M cHaney, J.

Appellant, Lula May Robbins, sued appellees alleging- in her complaint that she is the lawful wife of William Harrison Bobbins who was, at the time of their marriage, the owner of an undivided one-half interest in certain real estate in the.city of Hot Springs; that her husband acquired title thereto by conveyance from A. L. Rowan to her husband and his then wife, the appellee Lois Robbins; that in October, 1929, said W. H. Robbins and appellee Lois Robbins conveyed said real estate to appellee Dozier as trustee for Lois Robbins, who agreed to convey to Lois and had done so; that, as the wife of W. H. Robbins, she was entitled to a dower interest therein of one-third oif his one-half interest, for which she prayed judgment.

The court sustained a demurrer to this complaint, dismissed same for want of equity, and the case is here on appeal.

The demurrer was properly sustained. The complaint failed to state a canse of action. Appellant’s right of dower is inchoate. Dower does not ripen into- an estate or an interest therein until the death of the husband. Whether appellant has a possibility of dower in the real property owned by her husband and a former wife, who is still living, as an estate by the entirety, -we do not discuss. It is sufficient to say that her right of dower therein, if any, has not accrued, and the complaint, therefore, failed to state a cause of action.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Le Croy v. Commissioner
15 T.C. 143 (U.S. Tax Court, 1950)
LeCroy v. Commissioner
15 T.C. 143 (U.S. Tax Court, 1950)
Lecroy v. Cook, Commissioner of Revenues
204 S.W.2d 173 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1947)
Sanders v. Taylor
104 S.W.2d 797 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.W.2d 278, 181 Ark. 1105, 1930 Ark. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-robbins-ark-1930.