Robbins v. Lazart Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robbins v. Lazart Development Corp.

46 A.D.2d 891, 361 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3524

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A.D.2d 891 (Robbins v. Lazart Development Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robbins v. Lazart Development Corp., 46 A.D.2d 891, 361 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3524 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., third-party defendant Dember Construction Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 14,1974, which denied its motion to require plaintiff Florence D. Robbins to produce for discovery and inspection a transcript of testimony given by her at a statutory hearing before the Comptroller of the City of New York. Order reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The discovery and inspection shall proceed at a place and time to be specified in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given by appellant, or at such other time and place as the parties may stipulate. The motion was improperly denied (Rodriguez v. City of New York, 29 A D 2d 962, app. dsmd. 26 N Y 2d 833). Shapiro, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., third-party defendant Dember Construction Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 14,1974, which denied its motion to require plaintiff Florence D. Robbins to produce for discovery and inspection a transcript of testimony given by her at a statutory hearing before the Comptroller of the City of New York. Order reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The discovery and inspection shall proceed at a place and time to be specified in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given by appellant, or at such other time and place as the parties may stipulate. The motion was improperly denied (Rodriguez v. City of New York, 29 A D 2d 962, app. dsmd. 26 N Y 2d 833). Shapiro, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.2d 891, 361 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-lazart-development-corp-nyappdiv-1974.