Robbins v. Kinman

169 S.E. 304, 177 Ga. 46, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 108
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 10, 1933
DocketNo. 9429
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 169 S.E. 304 (Robbins v. Kinman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robbins v. Kinman, 169 S.E. 304, 177 Ga. 46, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 108 (Ga. 1933).

Opinion

I-Till, J.

Under the act of 1838 (Cobb’s Digest, 514; Civil Code (1910), § 5306), and under the Civil Code (1910), § 5430, no affidavit of illegality shall be received by any sheriff, or other executing officer, until after the issuance of an execution and a levy made thereunder. There is nothing in the present record to show that an execution had been issued; and therefore the trial court did not err in dismissing the affidavit of illegality. Ga. Ry. & Power Co. v. Head, 150 Ga. 177, 178 (103 S. E. 158); Carter v. Alma State Bank, 34 Ga. App. 766 (131 S. E. 184).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marietta Broadcasting Co. v. Advance Marketing Research, Inc.
200 S.E.2d 134 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
Associates Discount Corp. v. Gentry
101 S.E.2d 891 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
McClenton v. Wetherington
78 S.E.2d 550 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 S.E. 304, 177 Ga. 46, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-kinman-ga-1933.