Robbins v. Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Robbins v. Herman

13 A.D.2d 765, 217 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10633

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 25, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 765 (Robbins v. Herman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robbins v. Herman, 13 A.D.2d 765, 217 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for a stay granted on condition that intervenors-respondents-appellants serve and file their points, with the original record, with this court on or before May 31, 1961, with notice of argument for the June 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or [766]*766submitted on June 15, 1961. Petitioner-respondent’s points are to be served and filed on or before June 9, 1961. The stay granted herein is limited so as to permit petitioner-respondent to proceed through trial of the summary proceedings, but in the event that the summary proceeding is resolved against the intervenors-respondents-appellants, the entry of the final order shall be stayed pending the determination of the appeal herein. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for a stay granted on condition that intervenors-respondents-appellants serve and file their points, with the original record, with this court on or before May 31, 1961, with notice of argument for the June 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or [766]*766submitted on June 15, 1961. Petitioner-respondent’s points are to be served and filed on or before June 9, 1961. The stay granted herein is limited so as to permit petitioner-respondent to proceed through trial of the summary proceedings, but in the event that the summary proceeding is resolved against the intervenors-respondents-appellants, the entry of the final order shall be stayed pending the determination of the appeal herein. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 765, 217 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-herman-nyappdiv-1961.