Robbins v. . Fitz
33 N.Y. 420
Opinion
Held, that the question of fraud being found in favor of the plaintiff, she was entitled to recover the full value of the property, instead of the amount only due her from the assignor, and that any error in the charge of the judge respecting that rule of recovery, the defendant had no right to complain of, as the finding under it should have been for. the full value of the property.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robbins v. . Fitz, 33 N.Y. 420 (N.Y. 1865).
33 N.Y. 420 (Robbins v. . Fitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moynahan v. People
3 Colo. 367 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1877)