Robbins v. Eakin
This text of 3 N.J.L. 745 (Robbins v. Eakin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To enable a defendant to recover a sum of money against the plaintiff, there must be a set-off. The issue on the pleadings below, was; that the defendant had broke his agreement with the plaintiff. If he had, the plaintiff was entitled to damages; if he had not, the defendant ought to have judgment for his costs; but he could not recover a sum of money against the plaintiff.
Judgment revers ed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 N.J.L. 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-eakin-nj-1811.