Robbins v. Eakin

3 N.J.L. 745
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 15, 1811·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

To enable a defendant to recover a sum of money against the plaintiff, there must be a set-off. The issue on the pleadings below, was; that the defendant had broke his agreement with the plaintiff. If he had, the plaintiff was entitled to damages; if he had not, the defendant ought to have judgment for his costs; but he could not recover a sum of money against the plaintiff.

Judgment revers ed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robbins v. Eakin, 3 N.J.L. 745 (N.J. 1811).

3 N.J.L. 745 (Robbins v. Eakin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.