Robbins v. City of Titusville

Supreme Court of Florida

Robbins v. City of Titusville

176 So. 2d 899, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3229

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 30, 1965

DocketNo. 34362

StatusPublished

This text of 176 So. 2d 899 (Robbins v. City of Titusville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robbins v. City of Titusville, 176 So. 2d 899, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3229 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion of ap-pellee City of Titusville to dismiss this appeal because of lack of jurisdiction, the Court finds from the certificate of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Brevard County that the final decree validating the bonds in this cause was entered March 31, 1965; that a motion for rehearing directed to said final decree was duly filed and disposed of by the trial court by an order denying the same, which said latter order was entered April 7, 1965; that, thereafter on, to-wit: April 28, 1965 the appellant Theodore R. Robbins filed his notice of appeal from said final decree which, by virtue of the order [900]*900denying petition for rehearing of April 7, 1965, was rendered on said latter date. It is, thereupon

Ordered that said appeal not having been taken within twenty days from the date of the rendition of said final decree as provided by Section 75.08, Florida Statutes 1963, F.S.A., be and the same is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion of ap-pellee City of Titusville to dismiss this appeal because of lack of jurisdiction, the Court finds from the certificate of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Brevard County that the final decree validating the bonds in this cause was entered March 31, 1965; that a motion for rehearing directed to said final decree was duly filed and disposed of by the trial court by an order denying the same, which said latter order was entered April 7, 1965; that, thereafter on, to-wit: April 28, 1965 the appellant Theodore R. Robbins filed his notice of appeal from said final decree which, by virtue of the order [900]*900denying petition for rehearing of April 7, 1965, was rendered on said latter date. It is, thereupon

Ordered that said appeal not having been taken within twenty days from the date of the rendition of said final decree as provided by Section 75.08, Florida Statutes 1963, F.S.A., be and the same is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 So. 2d 899, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-city-of-titusville-fla-1965.