Robbins v. City of Auburn
This text of 550 A.2d 362 (Robbins v. City of Auburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Jeffrey and Miriam Robbins appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court (Androscoggin County; Brodrick, J.) under M.R.Civ.P. 80B affirming the decision of the Auburn Board of Assessment Review. As the parties seeking the abatement the burden is upon the taxpayers to demonstrate that the assessment is “manifestly wrong.” Delta Chemicals v. Town of Searsport, 438 A.2d 483, 484 (Me.1981). They have not shown that their lot is not buildable, and the Board correctly found that the property may be assessed at its “presently possible land use” value. 36 M.R.S.A. § 701-A (1978 & Supp.1987). The taxpayers’ constitutional rights were preserved because they were afforded a fair hearing and were not singled out or treated differently from any other similarly situ[363]*363ated property owners in the City of Auburn.
The entry is:
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
550 A.2d 362, 1988 Me. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-city-of-auburn-me-1988.