Robbins v. Capo

Florida Circuit Courts

Robbins v. Capo

33 Fla. Supp. 2d 45

CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

DecidedFebruary 24, 1989

DocketCase No. 88-25150 CA 30

StatusPublished

This text of 33 Fla. Supp. 2d 45 (Robbins v. Capo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robbins v. Capo, 33 Fla. Supp. 2d 45 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

MURRAY GOLDMAN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER ON DEFENDANT-TAXPAYERS’ MOTION TO STRIKE NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS

THIS CAUSE came before the Court February 22, 1989 pursuant to notice on the Defendant-taxpayers’ Motion to Strike Notice of Lis Pendens, and the Court having reviewed the motion, having heard argument of counsel, and being duly informed concerning the applica[46]*46ble authorities concludes that the lis pendens in this statutory proceeding to reinstate the Property Appraiser’s preliminary assessment is proper because “the required relief might specifically affect the property in question.” Worldwide Development Kendall Lakes West v Lot Headquarters, Inc., 305 So.2d 271, 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); § 48.23(3), Florida Statutes (1985). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant-taxpayers’ Motion to Strike Notice of Lis Pendens be and the same is hereby denied.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at Miami, Dade County, Florida, this 24th day of February, 1989.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

MURRAY GOLDMAN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER ON DEFENDANT-TAXPAYERS’ MOTION TO STRIKE NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS

THIS CAUSE came before the Court February 22, 1989 pursuant to notice on the Defendant-taxpayers’ Motion to Strike Notice of Lis Pendens, and the Court having reviewed the motion, having heard argument of counsel, and being duly informed concerning the applica[46]*46ble authorities concludes that the lis pendens in this statutory proceeding to reinstate the Property Appraiser’s preliminary assessment is proper because “the required relief might specifically affect the property in question.” Worldwide Development Kendall Lakes West v Lot Headquarters, Inc., 305 So.2d 271, 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); § 48.23(3), Florida Statutes (1985). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant-taxpayers’ Motion to Strike Notice of Lis Pendens be and the same is hereby denied.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at Miami, Dade County, Florida, this 24th day of February, 1989.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Fla. Supp. 2d 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-capo-flacirct-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack