Robbins v. Bridgman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Robbins v. Bridgman

84 N.Y.S. 1143

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 18, 1903·Published

Opinion

BLANCHARD, J.

The only question which appears to have been seriously litigated in this action was whether or not the plaintiff’s assignor was able, to secure a theatrical license, as contemplated by the agreement of August, 1902. ¿This was a question of fact, which the trial justice resolved in favor of the plaintiff, and we think his determination is fully justified by the evidence in the case. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLANCHARD, J.

The only question which appears to have been seriously litigated in this action was whether or not the plaintiff’s assignor was able, to secure a theatrical license, as contemplated by the agreement of August, 1902. ¿This was a question of fact, which the trial justice resolved in favor of the plaintiff, and we think his determination is fully justified by the evidence in the case. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Robbins v. Bridgman, 84 N.Y.S. 1143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

84 N.Y.S. 1143 (Robbins v. Bridgman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.