Robbins v. Bridgman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Robbins v. Bridgman

84 N.Y.S. 1143

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 84 N.Y.S. 1143 (Robbins v. Bridgman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robbins v. Bridgman, 84 N.Y.S. 1143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

BLANCHARD, J.

The only question which appears to have been seriously litigated in this action was whether or not the plaintiff’s assignor was able, to secure a theatrical license, as contemplated by the agreement of August, 1902. ¿This was a question of fact, which the trial justice resolved in favor of the plaintiff, and we think his determination is fully justified by the evidence in the case. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLANCHARD, J.

The only question which appears to have been seriously litigated in this action was whether or not the plaintiff’s assignor was able, to secure a theatrical license, as contemplated by the agreement of August, 1902. ¿This was a question of fact, which the trial justice resolved in favor of the plaintiff, and we think his determination is fully justified by the evidence in the case. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 N.Y.S. 1143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-bridgman-nyappterm-1903.