Robbins v. Bingham
4 Johns. 476
Opinion
The interest of the plaintiff, in the letter of credit, was not any assignable interest; it was not a general letter of credit, by addressed to a particular person. The defendant was responsible to the plaintiff only for the goods delivered by him, and not for the goods delivered by others. The report of the referees must be set aside.
Rule granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robbins v. Bingham, 4 Johns. 476 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).
4 Johns. 476 (Robbins v. Bingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Evansville National Bank v. Kaufmann
93 N.Y. 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1883)
Bleeker v. Hyde
3 F. Cas. 695 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan, 1843)
Birckhead & Carlisle v. William, George, John A., James & Stewart Brown
5 Hill & Den. 634 (New York Supreme Court, 1843)
Lanusse v. Barker
16 U.S. 48 (Supreme Court, 1818)
Lienow v. Pitcairn
15 F. Cas. 509 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, 1785)