Robbins v. Arend

1 Misc. 510, 20 N.Y.S. 992, 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 923
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Misc. 510 (Robbins v. Arend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robbins v. Arend, 1 Misc. 510, 20 N.Y.S. 992, 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 923 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Opinion

Newburger, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.

Plaintiffs had one John W. Hutton, who furnished hardware for the buildings against which the plaintiffs’ lien was filed.

The premises were sold under a mortgage foreclosure, at public auction, and purchased by defendant Arend. All of plaintiffs’ materials were delivered subsequent to said sale, and were used in the building.

From an examination of the record, there appears to have been no error committed by the trial justice.

The judgment against the defendants personally is proper and in accordance with the practice, they having executed a bond for the discharge of the mechanic’s lien, which bond had been approved by a justice of the Court of Common Pleas.

For these reasons, the judgment appealed from must be affirmed with costs.

Ehrlich, Ch. J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Misc. 510, 20 N.Y.S. 992, 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-arend-nynyccityct-1892.