Robbie v. Robbie

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Robbie v. Robbie

622 So. 2d 133, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7983, 1993 WL 288718

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 3, 1993

DocketNo. 93-1252

StatusPublished

This text of 622 So. 2d 133 (Robbie v. Robbie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robbie v. Robbie, 622 So. 2d 133, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7983, 1993 WL 288718 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court order enforcing the agreement between the Robbie siblings. The trial court properly concluded that the agreement was an integral part of the stipulation of settlement executed on behalf of the parents’ estates, and the order under review is supported by competent, substantial evidence. James P. Driscoll, Inc. v. Gould, 521 So.2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Raheb v. DiBattisto, 483 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Clegg v. Chipola Aviation, Inc., 458 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Moreover, the trial court properly concluded that it had jurisdiction over the subject matter of the motion, see Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc. v. Buchwald, 321 So.2d 628 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), appeal dismissed, 327 So.2d 31 (Fla.1976), and the parties’ substantial rights were not adversely affected by the issue’s procedural resolution. Accordingly, the order enforcing the agreement is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court order enforcing the agreement between the Robbie siblings. The trial court properly concluded that the agreement was an integral part of the stipulation of settlement executed on behalf of the parents’ estates, and the order under review is supported by competent, substantial evidence. James P. Driscoll, Inc. v. Gould, 521 So.2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Raheb v. DiBattisto, 483 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Clegg v. Chipola Aviation, Inc., 458 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Moreover, the trial court properly concluded that it had jurisdiction over the subject matter of the motion, see Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc. v. Buchwald, 321 So.2d 628 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), appeal dismissed, 327 So.2d 31 (Fla.1976), and the parties’ substantial rights were not adversely affected by the issue’s procedural resolution. Accordingly, the order enforcing the agreement is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

622 So. 2d 133, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7983, 1993 WL 288718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbie-v-robbie-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack