Robb v. United States
233 F. 525, 147 C.C.A. 411, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2495
Opinion
This case involved one of those accounting disputes, which arose between the government and clerks of the Circuit - Court when that court was abolished. The facts of the case are fully-set forth in the opinion of the court below, which is set forth in the margin.1
[527] As we agree with the conclusion reached by Judge Thompson, we restrict ourselves to affirming the case on his opinion, noting the fact, also, that the same conclusion was reached in Darling v. United States, Case No. 32514, Court of Claims.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robb v. United States, 233 F. 525, 147 C.C.A. 411, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2495 (3d Cir. 1916).
233 F. 525 (Robb v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gross v. United States
64 F.2d 72 (Ninth Circuit, 1933)