Robb v. O'Malley

Opinion

1 2 3 7 8 MICHAEL JAMES ROBB, Case No. 24-cv-02885-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 10 v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED Re: Dkt. No. | Defendant. a 12

v 14 Plaintiff Michael James Robb filed this action on May 13, 2024. Dkt. No. 1. Pursuant to

15 the Social Security Procedural Order issued on May 14, 2024, Mr. Robb’s motion for summary 16 judgment or remand was due within 30 days of service of defendant Martin O’Malley’s answer.

= 17 || Dkt. No. 3. Commissioner O’Malley filed an answer and the administrative record on July 12,

18 2024. Dkt. No. 10. Accordingly, Mr. Robb’s motion was due no later than August 12, 2024. No 19 motion has been filed. 20 The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the 21 orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 22 (1962). Mr. Robb is directed to file a written response to this order by August 23, 2024 and show 23 cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 25 Dated: August 16, 2024 26 27 VaraiuiaE, LaMarche: > Virginia K. DeMarchi 8 United States Magistrate Judge