Robart v. Long

Supreme Court of Missouri

Robart v. Long

65 Mo. 223

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedApril 15, 1877

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 65 Mo. 223 (Robart v. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robart v. Long, 65 Mo. 223 (Mo. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

It is the settled law of this State that a bill of exceptions must be prepared and signed during the term, unless the court, by consent of the parties, orders otherwise. As the record shows that the plaintiff in this case is allowed sixty days after trial within which to pre.pare his bill, and no consent of the defendant appears on the record, the bill of exceptions must be disregarded and the judgment be affirmed.

Aeeirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

It is the settled law of this State that a bill of exceptions must be prepared and signed during the term, unless the court, by consent of the parties, orders otherwise. As the record shows that the plaintiff in this case is allowed sixty days after trial within which to pre.pare his bill, and no consent of the defendant appears on the record, the bill of exceptions must be disregarded and the judgment be affirmed.

Aeeirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 Mo. 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robart-v-long-mo-1877.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack