Robart v. Long

65 Mo. 223
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided April 15, 1877·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

It is the settled law of this State that a bill of exceptions must be prepared and signed during the term, unless the court, by consent of the parties, orders otherwise. As the record shows that the plaintiff in this case is allowed sixty days after trial within which to pre.pare his bill, and no consent of the defendant appears on the record, the bill of exceptions must be disregarded and the judgment be affirmed.

Aeeirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robart v. Long, 65 Mo. 223 (Mo. 1877).

65 Mo. 223 (Robart v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of North America v. Fletcher
15 Mo. App. 272 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1884)
Carter v. Prior
78 Mo. 222 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
McCarty v. Cunningham
75 Mo. 279 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1882)