Robaina v. Gran Central Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Robaina v. Gran Central Corp.

778 So. 2d 487, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1781, 2001 WL 167268

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 21, 2001

DocketNo. 3D99-2802

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 778 So. 2d 487 (Robaina v. Gran Central Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robaina v. Gran Central Corp., 778 So. 2d 487, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1781, 2001 WL 167268 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, as purchasers, sued the defendants, as sellers, upon a land sale contract seeking a) specific performance, b) damages for breach of contract, and c) damages for unjust enrichment. After hearing oral argument on defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the trial court entered final judgment for the sellers, from which the buyers appeal. We find that there are triable issues of fact with respect to the claimed oral modification of the written agreement. Additionally, there are most certainly triable issues of fact with respect to unjust enrichment claim. For these reasons, summary judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, as purchasers, sued the defendants, as sellers, upon a land sale contract seeking a) specific performance, b) damages for breach of contract, and c) damages for unjust enrichment. After hearing oral argument on defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the trial court entered final judgment for the sellers, from which the buyers appeal. We find that there are triable issues of fact with respect to the claimed oral modification of the written agreement. Additionally, there are most certainly triable issues of fact with respect to unjust enrichment claim. For these reasons, summary judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

778 So. 2d 487, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1781, 2001 WL 167268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robaina-v-gran-central-corp-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack