Roat v. Frear
This text of 31 A. 861 (Roat v. Frear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only specification of error is an extract from the learned trial judge’s charge, directing a verdict in favor of defendant. By agreement of counsel for the parties, the statement signed by them, embracing an extract from defendant’s testimony, etc., has been printed in appellant’s paper-book “in lien of the evidence taken at the trial.” That necessarily excludes from consideration any evidence or allegations of fact not contained in the agreement. In view of the facts thus agreed upon, there appears to be no error in directing a verdict for defendant.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 A. 861, 167 Pa. 614, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roat-v-frear-pa-1895.