Roark v. Ouachita National Bank in Monroe

359 S.W.2d 289, 1962 Tex. App. LEXIS 2649
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 24, 1962·No. No. 4029·Published

Opinion

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This proceeding involves a Motion to Affirm on Certificate. Plaintiff Bank secured a judgment against defendant Roark in the District Court of McLennan County on 1 February 1962. Defendant gave notice of appeal; filed bond; and tendered a transcript for filing in this court on 4 April 1962 (after the expiration of the 60 day period for filing transcript prescribed by Rule 386 T.R.C.P. had expired). Such transcript was not filed, but was marked "Received, not filed, 4 April 1962.”

Thereafter, on 27 April 1962, plaintiff filed motion for affirmance on certificate.

It is undisputed that the transcript was not tendered for filing within the 60 day period prescribed by Rule 386 T.R.C.P., nor was motion made to extend the time for such filing within the IS day period prescribed, or at any other time.

Defendant’s Motion for Affirmance on Certificate is granted. See: Rule 387 T.R.C.P., Taylor v. Humble Oil Co., Tex.Civ.App., 293 S.W.2d 834.

Affirmed on certificate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roark v. Ouachita National Bank in Monroe, 359 S.W.2d 289, 1962 Tex. App. LEXIS 2649 (Tex. Ct. App. 1962).

359 S.W.2d 289 (Roark v. Ouachita National Bank in Monroe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. Humble Oil Refining Company
293 S.W.2d 834 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1956)