Roaring Creek Water Co. v. Anthracite Coal Co.
This text of 61 A. 811 (Roaring Creek Water Co. v. Anthracite Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from a decree granting a preliminary injunction. In accordance with the practice of the court we withhold any expression of opinion on the merits of the controversy until after final hearing and decree, and determine only whether on the facts developed an injunction should have been granted or refused. It was shown at the hearing that the defendants were pumping impure water which had accumulated in a coal mine into a stream where it polluted the supply of drinking water for more than 30,000 people, when by the construction of a flume at a trifling expense the mine water could be discharged into another water course where it would injure no one. The case was clearly one for the granting’ of a preliminary injunction.
The decree of the' court is affirmed at the cost of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 A. 811, 212 Pa. 115, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roaring-creek-water-co-v-anthracite-coal-co-pa-1905.