ROAQUE v. Walmart, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided December 7, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-01979·Unknown

Opinion

KURT R. BONDS, ESQ. 2 Nevada Bar No. 6228 MADISON M. AGUIRRE, ESQ. 3 Nevada Bar No. 16183

TANYA M. FRASER, ESQ. 4 Nevada Bar No. 13872 5 1160 North Town Center Drive Suite 330 6 Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 (702) 998-1022 7 nvefile@hallevans.com

Attorneys for Defendants 8

11 MELINDA ROAQUE, an individual, Case No.: 2:22-cv-01979-JCM-BNW

12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 STIPULATION TO EXTEND WALMART, INC., a foreign corporation; DISCOVERY PLAN AND 15 DOE MANAGERS I through X; DOE SCHEDULING ORDER

16 MAINTENANCE and/or INSPECTION (SECOND REQUEST) EMPLOYEES or AGENTS I through X; 17 DOES I through XX; ROE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ENTITIES I through X; 18 ROE MAINTENANCE and/or INSPECTION ENTITIES I through X; and ROE 19 CORPORATIONS and/or ENTITIES I

20 through XX, inclusive, 21 Defendants. 22

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, by and through their 23

respective counsel, that the deadlines remaining in this case shall be extended in this matter as 24

described herein. 25

26 I. Discovery Completed

Plaintiff has served the following discovery to date: 27 served on February 8, 2023. 1

2 2. Plaintiff’s First Supplement to Initial List of Witnesses and Documents, served on

February 22, 2023. 3

4 3. Plaintiff’s Second Supplement to Initial List of Witnesses and Documents Produced

Pursuant to FRCP 26(a), served on February 27, 2023. 5

6 4. Plaintiff’s Third Supplement to Initial List of Witnesses and Documents Produced

Pursuant to FRCP 26(a), served on March 9, 2023. 7

8 5. Plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories, Requests for Admissions, and Requests for

Production of Documents, served on March 15, 2023. 9

10 6. Plaintiff’s Fourth Supplement to Initial List of Witnesses and Documents Produced

Pursuant to FRCP 26(a), served on April 24, 2023. 11

12 7. Plaintiff’s Fifth Supplement to Initial List of Witnesses and Documents Produced

Pursuant to FRCP 26(a), served on May 17, 2023. 13

14 8. Plaintiff’s Designation of Expert Witnesses, served on June 7, 2023.

15 9. Plaintiff’s Sixth Supplement to Initial List of Witnesses and Documents Produced

Pursuant to FRCP 26(a), served July 10, 2023. 16

17 10. Plaintiff’s Notice of Taking the Deposition of the Knowledgeable Person(s) of

Walmart, Inc, Pursuant to FRCP 30(b)(6) via Videoconference, served on July 12, 18

2023. 19

20 11. Plaintiff’s Seventh Supplement to Initial List of Witnesses and Documents Produced

Pursuant to FRCP 26(a), served July 24, 2023. 21

22 12. Plaintiff’s Eighth Supplement to Initial List of Witnesses and Documents Produced

Pursuant to FRCP 26(a), served on August 29, 2023. 23

24 13. Plaintiff’s First Supplement to Designation of Expert Witnesses, served November 3,

2023 25

26 14. 30(b)(6) Deposition of Defendant’s Person Most Knowledgeable, Raymond Hope,

taken November 19, 2023 27 Defendant Has Served the following discovery to date: 1

2 1. Defendant Walmart Inc.’s Initial Disclosure of Witness Statements and Documents,

served on February 22, 2023. 3

4 2. Defendant Walmart Inc.’s Responses to Plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories,

Requests for Admissions, and Requests for Production of Documents, served on May 5

5, 2023. 6

7 3. Defendant Walmart Inc.’s First Supplement to Disclosure of Witness Statements and

Documents, served on May 5, 2023. 8

9 4. Defendant Walmart Inc.’s Initial FRCP 26(a)(2) Disclosure of Expert Witnesses,

served on June 8, 2023. 10

11 5. Defendant Walmart Inc.’s FRCP 26 Second Supplement to Disclosure of Witness

Statements and Documents, served on June 8, 2023. 12

13 6. Defendant Walmart Inc.’s Notice of Taking the Deposition of Plaintiff Melinda

Roaque, served on July 6, 2023. 14

15 7. Defendant Walmart Inc.’s First Set of Interrogatories, Requests for Production of

Documents, and Requests for Admissions to Plaintiff, served on July 6, 2023. 16

17 8. Defendant Walmart Inc.’s Amended Notice of Taking the Deposition of Plaintiff

Melinda Roaque, served on July 11, 2023. 18

19 9. Defendant Walmart Inc.’s Second Amended Notice of Taking the Deposition of

Plaintiff Melinda Roaque, served on July 13, 2023. 20

21 10. Defendant Walmart Inc.’s Third Amended Notice of Taking the Deposition of

Plaintiff Melinda Roaque, served on July 13, 2023. 22

23 11. Deposition of Plaintiff Melinda Roaque, taken October 18, 2023.

24 II. Reasons Why Dispositive Motions and Motions in Limine Cannot Be Completed

25 Within the Time Set by Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order.

Good Cause 26

Good cause exists in this case to grant the parties’ requested extension. Although this is 27 diligently worked to move the case forward and have been working to resolve Plaintiff’s claims 1

prior to trial. The parties are coordinating private mediation of Plaintiff’s claims and anticipate 2

the mediation will occur by early February, depending upon availability of the neutral. An 3

extension of time to accommodate this mediation is requested to avoid costs of further litigation 4

and to avoid unduly burdening this Court’s calendar. Thus, the parties respectfully request that 5

the remaining deadlines in this matter, namely the deadline for dispositive motions and motions 6

in limine, be extended by a period of 90 days as described herein. 7

Furthermore, although LR IA 6-1(a) mandates that requests for extensions be made prior 8

to the relevant deadline, good cause exists for the parties’ delay in seeking this discovery 9

extension, as discussed below. The parties have worked diligently throughout the discovery 10

process to further this matter and now believe the matter may resolve prior to trial. As such, the 11

parties respectfully request that the Court find that good cause exists to grant their requested 12

extension. 13

Excusable Neglect 14

LR IA 6-1(a) mandates that a motion or stipulation to extend a deadline set forth in a 15

discovery plan must be received by the court no later than 21 days before the expiration of the 16

subject deadline. A request made within 21 days of the subject deadline must be supported by a 17

showing of good cause. A request made after the expiration of the subject deadline will not be 18

granted unless the movant also demonstrates that the failure to act was the result of excusable 19

neglect. To determine whether neglect is excusable, four factors must be met: (1) the danger of 20

prejudice to the opposing party; (2) the length of the delay and its potential impact on the 21

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROAQUE v. Walmart, Inc., (D. Nev. 2023).

ROAQUE v. Walmart, Inc. (ROAQUE v. Walmart, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.