Roane v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Roane v. State

22 S.E. 374, 97 Ga. 195

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 13, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 S.E. 374 (Roane v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roane v. State, 22 S.E. 374, 97 Ga. 195 (Ga. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. Where several persons, jointly indicted for an offense which could be committed by one person alone, are tried together, there may, if the evidence so authorizes,, be a lawful conviction of one or more of them without convicting all.

2. The evidence in this case warranted the verdict, and there was no merit in the ground of the motion for a new trial relating to newly discovered evidence. Judgment affirmed.

J ones & Bowden, G. L. Bass and R. A. E. Hamby, for plaintiffs in error. Hoioard Thompson, solicitor-general, and F. M. Johnson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lumpkin, J.

1. Where several persons, jointly indicted for an offense which could be committed by one person alone, are tried together, there may, if the evidence so authorizes,, be a lawful conviction of one or more of them without convicting all.

2. The evidence in this case warranted the verdict, and there was no merit in the ground of the motion for a new trial relating to newly discovered evidence. Judgment affirmed.

J ones & Bowden, G. L. Bass and R. A. E. Hamby, for plaintiffs in error. Hoioard Thompson, solicitor-general, and F. M. Johnson, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 S.E. 374, 97 Ga. 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roane-v-state-ga-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack