Roan v. State
177 S.W. 492, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 486
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of burglary.
There is neither a statement of facts nor bill of exceptions in the record. The only ground of the motion for new trial is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict. Of course, this cannot be considered, in the absence of a statement of facts.
There being nothing we can review, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roan v. State, 177 S.W. 492, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 486 (Tex. 1915).
177 S.W. 492 (Roan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.