Roan Mountain Iron & Steel Co. v. Edwards
16 S.E. 334, 111 N.C. 500
Opinion
When this case was before us on a former occasion (110 N. C., 353), we held in effect that, upon the *501 case agreed, the plaintiff was entitled to recover; but at the conclusion of the opinion it was stated that there should be a new trial. His Honor therefore was well warranted in ruling as he did.
Upon further consideration, we think that a new trial should not have been ordered, but that this Court should have directed that a judgment be entered for the plaintiff in the Court below.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roan Mountain Iron & Steel Co. v. Edwards, 16 S.E. 334, 111 N.C. 500 (N.C. 1892).
16 S.E. 334 (Roan Mountain Iron & Steel Co. v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Steel Co. v. . Edwards
14 S.E. 861 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1892)