Roaden v. Dermott

Eighth Circuit

Roaden v. Dermott

50 F. App'x 332

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 8, 2002·No. No. 02-3055·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Douglas Roaden appeals the district court’s¹ order dismissing his pro se complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). After careful review of the complaint, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing it as frivolous.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Douglas Roaden appeals the district court’s¹ order dismissing his pro se complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). After careful review of the complaint, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing it as frivolous.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Roaden v. Dermott, 50 F. App'x 332 (8th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

50 F. App'x 332 (Roaden v. Dermott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related