Roaden v. Dermott
50 F. App'x 332
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 8, 2002
DocketNo. 02-3055
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 50 F. App'x 332 (Roaden v. Dermott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roaden v. Dermott, 50 F. App'x 332 (8th Cir. 2002).
Opinion
Douglas Roaden appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his pro se complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). After careful review of the complaint, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing it as frivolous.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Roaden v. Dermott
539 U.S. 959 (Supreme Court, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
50 F. App'x 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roaden-v-dermott-ca8-2002.