Roache v. Bucholz
This text of Roache v. Bucholz (Roache v. Bucholz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1152
ALLEN JAMES ROACHE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CURTIS BUCHOLZ, Policy Holder; LANDMARK COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED; SAND COLE; ROBERT SPRINGTON; SANDRA JACKSON, Supervisor; KELLY IRENE ZAK, Driver; PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE; PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY; COREY MEDDERS, Claims Adjuster; SENTRY CLAIMS SERVICE; KIMBERLY KERR, Claims Adjuster; CONCENTRA; JEAN WHALEN, RN, Sentry Insurance Case Manager; ATLANTIC ORTHOPAEDIC SPECIALISTS; TIMOTHY BUDORICK, Medical Doctor; ADVANCE PAIN MANAGEMENT & REHABILITATION, P.C.; LISA BARR, Medical Doctor; THOMAS MORAN, D.O.; ROBERT M. SPEAR; STEVEN GERSHON; SPORTS THERAPY AND INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE; PETER OWENS, LPTA; ALLIED CHIROPRACTIC CENTER; BRIAN LANCASTER, Doctor; COLGAN, KIMBALL & CARNES, Attorneys at Law; RICHARD L. COLGAN; KEITH LOREN KIMBALL; THE VIRGINIAN PILOT; THE VIRGINIAN PILOT PRODUCTION PLANT CIRCULATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-03-81-4)
Submitted: June 18, 2004 Decided: July 15, 2004 Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and Hamilton, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Allen James Roache, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William McCardell Furr, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, Norfolk, Virginia; Allen W. Beasley, BREEDEN, SALB, BEASLEY & DUVALL, Norfolk, Virginia; Bryan Craig Dunkum, STARK, DUNKUM, FITZGERALD & LANE, Richmond, Virginia; Paul R. Schmidt, HUFF, POOLE & MAHONEY, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia; M. Pierce Rucker, II, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia; Matthew LeRoy Curtis, GOODMAN, ALLEN & FILETTI, P.L.L.C., Norfolk, Virginia; Robert Moreland, THE HEILIG FIRM, Norfolk, Virginia; Brewster Stone Rawls, BREWSTER S. RAWLS & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; John David McChesney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; William Gilbert Shields, Sr., THORSEN & SCHER, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia; William Carl Bischoff, CROSHAW, SIEGEL, BEALE, HAUSER & LEWIS, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Kellam Thomas Parks, STALLINGS & RICHARDSON, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Allen James Roache, Jr., appeals the district court’s
orders granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss his complaint filed
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981-1983 (2000). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Roache v. Bucholz, No. CA-03-
81-4 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 10, 2003; Nov. 5, 2003; Nov. 20, 2003;
filed Jan. 16, 2004 & entered Jan. 20, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roache v. Bucholz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roache-v-bucholz-ca4-2004.