Roache v. Bucholz

Fourth Circuit

Roache v. Bucholz

102 F. App'x 783

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 15, 2004·No. No. 04-1152·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Allen James Roache, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981-1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roache v. Bucholz, No. CA-03-81-4 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 10, 2003; Nov. 5, 2003; Nov. 20, 2003; filed Jan. 16, 2004 & entered Jan. 20, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Allen James Roache, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981-1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roache v. Bucholz, No. CA-03-81-4 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 10, 2003; Nov. 5, 2003; Nov. 20, 2003; filed Jan. 16, 2004 & entered Jan. 20, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Roache v. Bucholz, 102 F. App'x 783 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

102 F. App'x 783 (Roache v. Bucholz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related