Roach v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Roach v. Williams

123 S.E. 748, 32 Ga. App. 446, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 447

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 10, 1924

Docket15526

StatusPublished

This text of 123 S.E. 748 (Roach v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roach v. Williams, 123 S.E. 748, 32 Ga. App. 446, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 447 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. All the special grounds of the motion for a new trial are based upon alleged errors in the charge of the court. When the excerpts complained of are considered in connection with the remainder of the charge and the facts of the case, none of them requires a reversal of the judgment below.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. All the special grounds of the motion for a new trial are based upon alleged errors in the charge of the court. When the excerpts complained of are considered in connection with the remainder of the charge and the facts of the case, none of them requires a reversal of the judgment below.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 S.E. 748, 32 Ga. App. 446, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roach-v-williams-gactapp-1924.