Roach v. Tallahatchie County

78 Miss. 303
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 78 Miss. 303 (Roach v. Tallahatchie County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roach v. Tallahatchie County, 78 Miss. 303 (Mich. 1900).

Opinion

Calhoon, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

On. appeals from the action of boards of supervisors code, §79, requires that bills of exceptions “ shall be signed by the person acting as president. ’ ’ In the case at bar that officer refused to sign the bill, whereupon Mr. Roach, the appellant, did not proceed by mandamus, as he might have done, to compel a signature, but had it signed by two disinterested attending counsel, under code, § 737. The circuit court on the county’s motion, struck out the bill of exceptions. This action was proper under the law. Section 737 does not apply because by reading it and preceding sections from § 733, it will be seen that it is plainly restricted to circuit courts, and, therefore, no help comes from § 629. Section 555 expressly makes the circuit court law as to bills of exceptions applicable to chancery courts. There is no such provision as to boards of supervisors. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Jackson, Mississippi v. Ben Allen
242 So. 3d 8 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2018)
Tunica County Board of Supervisors v. HWCC-Tunica, LLC
237 So. 3d 115 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2017)
Charles Gallagher v. City of Waveland, Mississippi
182 So. 3d 471 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2015)
Dimp Powell v. Municipal Election Commission
156 So. 3d 250 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2014)
M.L.R. v. Pontotoc City School District Board of Trustees
46 So. 3d 874 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2010)
Reed, Mayor, Etc. v. Adams
111 So. 2d 222 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1959)
Polk v. City of Hattiesburg
69 So. 675 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 Miss. 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roach-v-tallahatchie-county-miss-1900.