Roach v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Roach v. State

439 So. 2d 986, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25308

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 25, 1983

DocketNo. 83-338

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 439 So. 2d 986 (Roach v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roach v. State, 439 So. 2d 986, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25308 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was charged by indictment with first degree murder and two counts of armed robbery with a firearm. He was found guilty by a jury and sentenced by the court to concurrent terms of life imprisonment, on each of the counts.

Appellant contends on appeal that (1) the trial court erred in denying his motions for mistrial based on the ground that the prosecuting attorney made improper remarks in closing argument, (2) the court erred in restricting cross-examination of an alleged eye-witness, and (3) the court erred in commenting upon defense counsel’s trial conduct in the presence of the jury.

We have carefully considered all of appellant’s points and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Therefore the conviction and sentences are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI