Roach v. Option One Mortgage Corp.

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 26, 2009
• Docket: 09-1150
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1150

CRYSTAL J. ROACH,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION; H&R BLOCK; DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

1ST PRINCIPLE MORTGAGE, LLC; CLAYTON HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED; ECG REAL ESTATE SERVICES; BIERMAN, GEESING & WARD, LLC,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00225-TSE-JFA)

Submitted: August 12, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Crystal J. Roach, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Todd Fowler, REED SMITH, LLP, Falls Church, Virginia, Stacy Leann Haney, REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, Michael B. Roberts, REED SMITH, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Crystal J. Roach appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants in this

civil action alleging violation of the Truth in Lending Act, 15

U.S.C. § 1601 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Roach v. Option One Mortgage Corp., No.

1:08-cv-00225-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va. Jan. 21, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED