Roach v. Groziani
This text of 252 A.D. 796 (Roach v. Groziani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action upon a promissory note, judgment of the City Court of the. City of White Plains for plaintiff affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hagarty, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur; Carswell and Adel, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and send back for a new trial so that the facts may be more fully developed and the truth as to what the complete representations and arrangement were may be ascertained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 796, 300 N.Y.S. 706, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roach-v-groziani-nyappdiv-1937.