Roach v. Federal National Mortgage Corp.

641 So. 2d 186, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8252
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 19, 1994·No. Nos. 93-728, 93-1026 and 93-1057 to 93-1062·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Consistent with this court’s recent decision in James v. Nationsbank Trust Co. Nat. Ass’n, 639 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), we remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings with regard only to the issue of whether appellants were fraudulently induced to sign the notes and mortgages which are the subject of each of their foreclosures and, if so, whether appellee ever attained the status of a holder in due course.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

HARRIS, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roach v. Federal National Mortgage Corp., 641 So. 2d 186, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8252 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

641 So. 2d 186 (Roach v. Federal National Mortgage Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Najera v. Nationsbank Trust Co., NA
707 So. 2d 1153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)