R.N. v. A.J.

Missouri Court of Appeals

R.N. v. A.J.

507 S.W.3d 617, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1309, 2016 WL 7385567

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 20, 2016·No. No. ED 104002·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

R.N. (‘Wife”) appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to renew the one-year [618] full order of protection under the Adult Abuse Act that the trial court entered against her husband, A.J. (“Husband”), in September 2014. Wife contends the trial court erred in finding that she failed to meet her burden of proving that the expiration of the full order of protection would place her in an immediate and present danger of abuse. We disagree and affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

R.N. (‘Wife”) appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to renew the one-year [618] full order of protection under the Adult Abuse Act that the trial court entered against her husband, A.J. (“Husband”), in September 2014. Wife contends the trial court erred in finding that she failed to meet her burden of proving that the expiration of the full order of protection would place her in an immediate and present danger of abuse. We disagree and affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

R.N. v. A.J., 507 S.W.3d 617, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1309, 2016 WL 7385567 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

507 S.W.3d 617 (R.N. v. A.J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.