R.N. v. A.J.

Missouri Court of Appeals

R.N. v. A.J.

507 S.W.3d 617, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1309, 2016 WL 7385567

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 20, 2016

DocketNo. ED 104002

StatusPublished

This text of 507 S.W.3d 617 (R.N. v. A.J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R.N. v. A.J., 507 S.W.3d 617, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1309, 2016 WL 7385567 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

R.N. (‘Wife”) appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to renew the one-year [618]*618full order of protection under the Adult Abuse Act that the trial court entered against her husband, A.J. (“Husband”), in September 2014. Wife contends the trial court erred in finding that she failed to meet her burden of proving that the expiration of the full order of protection would place her in an immediate and present danger of abuse. We disagree and affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

R.N. (‘Wife”) appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to renew the one-year [618]*618full order of protection under the Adult Abuse Act that the trial court entered against her husband, A.J. (“Husband”), in September 2014. Wife contends the trial court erred in finding that she failed to meet her burden of proving that the expiration of the full order of protection would place her in an immediate and present danger of abuse. We disagree and affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

507 S.W.3d 617, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1309, 2016 WL 7385567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rn-v-aj-moctapp-2016.