R.M.F. v. D.C.

55 So. 3d 684
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 25, 2011·No. No. 2D10-250·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

R.M.F., the Father, seeks review of a final judgment of paternity and challenges the award of attorney’s fees to D.C., the Mother, and the visitation schedule set forth therein. The lack of a trial transcript precludes this court from reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Mother’s entitlement to attorney’s fees and the visitation schedule. See Smith v. Smith, 39 So.3d 458, 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). However, we reverse that portion of the final judgment awarding attorney’s fees because the final judgment does not contain any findings justifying the amount of the award. See Macarty v. Macarty, 29 So.3d 434, 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CASANUEVA, C.J., and WHATLEY, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R.M.F. v. D.C., 55 So. 3d 684 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

55 So. 3d 684 (R.M.F. v. D.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SARA CRISTINA BABUN, etc. v. STOK KON + BRAVERMAN, etc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021
DAVID L. DOOD v. LORI L. DOOD
268 So. 3d 254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)