R.M. v. State
870 So. 2d 917, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5467, 2004 WL 840260
This text of 870 So. 2d 917 (R.M. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
R.M. v. State, 870 So. 2d 917, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5467, 2004 WL 840260 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Ragsdale v. State, 720 So.2d 203 (Fla.1998); Evans v. State, 795 So.2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Williams v. State, 689 So.2d 393 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), review denied, 697 So.2d 513 (Fla.1997); Kopel v. Kopel, 832 So.2d 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)(Schwartz, C.J., specially concurring), review denied, 848 So.2d 1154 (Fla.2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kopel v. Kopel
832 So. 2d 108 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Ragsdale v. State
720 So. 2d 203 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Williams v. State
689 So. 2d 393 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Evans v. State
795 So. 2d 275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
870 So. 2d 917, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5467, 2004 WL 840260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rm-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.