R.M. v. New York City Department of Education

S.D. New York

R.M. v. New York City Department of Education

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 30, 2025·No. 1:25-cv-01871·Unknown

Opinion

ELECTRONICALLY FILEI DOC #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED: _ 6/30/2025 _ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK R.M., individually and on behalf of R.M.C., Plaintiffs, 1:25-cv-1871-MKV -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL New York City Department of Education Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiff informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. [ECF No. 10]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by July 30, 2025. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. i . . Date: June 30, 2025 vy cA vaKOocir New York, NY United Statés District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ELECTRONICALLY FILEI DOC #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED: _ 6/30/2025 _ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK R.M., individually and on behalf of R.M.C., Plaintiffs, 1:25-cv-1871-MKV -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL New York City Department of Education Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiff informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. [ECF No. 10]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by July 30, 2025. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. i . . Date: June 30, 2025 vy cA vaKOocir New York, NY United Statés District Judge

R.M. v. New York City Department of Education, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

R.M. v. New York City Department of Education (R.M. v. New York City Department of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related