R.M. v. Department of Children & Families

770 So. 2d 295, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14547, 2000 WL 1651589
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 6, 2000
DocketNo. 1D99-4709
StatusPublished

This text of 770 So. 2d 295 (R.M. v. Department of Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.M. v. Department of Children & Families, 770 So. 2d 295, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14547, 2000 WL 1651589 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order by which his parental rights were terminated. Because the record reveals that the appellant was not fully informed of his right to counsel at the dependency hearing, we reverse the appealed order. See In the Interest of D.P., 595 So.2d 62 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Belflower v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 578 So.2d 827 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

MINER and ALLEN, JJ., and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Belflower v. DHRS
578 So. 2d 827 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
In Interest of DP
595 So. 2d 62 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
770 So. 2d 295, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14547, 2000 WL 1651589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rm-v-department-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2000.