R.M. v. Department of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

R.M. v. Department of Children & Families

770 So. 2d 295, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14547, 2000 WL 1651589

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 2000·No. No. 1D99-4709·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order by which his parental rights were terminated. Because the record reveals that the appellant was not fully informed of his right to counsel at the dependency hearing, we reverse the appealed order. See In the Interest of D.P., 595 So.2d 62 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Belflower v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 578 So.2d 827 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

MINER and ALLEN, JJ., and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order by which his parental rights were terminated. Because the record reveals that the appellant was not fully informed of his right to counsel at the dependency hearing, we reverse the appealed order. See In the Interest of D.P., 595 So.2d 62 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Belflower v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 578 So.2d 827 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

MINER and ALLEN, JJ., and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, CONCUR.

R.M. v. Department of Children & Families, 770 So. 2d 295, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14547, 2000 WL 1651589 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

770 So. 2d 295 (R.M. v. Department of Children & Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related