R.M., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
This text of R.M., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (R.M., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
R.M., the Father, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
No. 4D21-1940
[January 6, 2022]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jose Izquierdo, Judge; L.T. Case No. 20-910 CJ-DP.
Roger Ally of the Law Offices of Roger Ally, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.
Carolyn Schwarz, Children’s Legal Services, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Department of Children and Families.
Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sarah Todd Weitz and Samantha C. Valley, Senior Attorneys, Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian Ad Litem Program.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
R.M., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rm-the-father-v-department-of-children-and-families-fladistctapp-2022.