RM & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING, INC. A/A/O LIVAN DELGADO v. OLYMPUS INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida

RM & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING, INC. A/A/O LIVAN DELGADO v. OLYMPUS INSURANCE COMPANY

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 14, 2021

Docket21-0211

StatusPublished

This text of RM & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING, INC. A/A/O LIVAN DELGADO v. OLYMPUS INSURANCE COMPANY (RM & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING, INC. A/A/O LIVAN DELGADO v. OLYMPUS INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

RM & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING, INC. A/A/O LIVAN DELGADO v. OLYMPUS INSURANCE COMPANY, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed July 14, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-211 Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-11869 SP & 20-192 AP ________________

RM & Associates Consulting, Inc. a/a/o Livan Delgado, Appellant,

vs.

Olympus Insurance Company, Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael G. Barket, Judge.

Font & Nelson, PLLC, and Jose P. Font and Jaime Martin (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.

Gutterman Trial Group, and Marc J. Gutterman and Dean R. Mallett (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and SCALES and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Restoration 1 of Port St. Lucie v. Ark Royal Ins. Co., 255

So. 3d 344, 348 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (holding that a provision of a property

insurance policy requiring the consent of all insureds and the mortgagee

before the insureds’ rights may be assigned is enforceable).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI