R.L.W. v. State

467 So. 2d 828, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1071, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13684
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 26, 1985
DocketNo. 84-1216
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 467 So. 2d 828 (R.L.W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.L.W. v. State, 467 So. 2d 828, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1071, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13684 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The parties have agreed that the three-month minimum period of community control imposed by the trial court is improper. See § 39.11(3), Fla.Stat. (1983), and L.J.N. v. State, 411 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). We strike this portion of the commitment order, but note that this question [829]*829apparently is moot due to the passage of time.

This case is otherwise AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and OTT and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of K.W.G. v. State
510 So. 2d 1050 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
467 So. 2d 828, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1071, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rlw-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.