R.L.H. v. United Services Automobile Ass'n
This text of 327 F. App'x 714 (R.L.H. v. United Services Automobile Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
“Covered persons” under the policy are “You or any family member.” A family member means “a person related to you by blood, marriage or adoption who is a resident of your household.” Excluded from coverage is bodily injury “for which a eov[715]*715ered person becomes legally responsible to pay to a member of the covered person’s family residing in that covered person’s household.”
R.L.H. Ill, by virtue of California Civil Code section 43.1, was a person at the time of the accident and the infliction of the injury. But was he a family member resident in his father’s household? If he was, he was insured. By virtue of the exclusion his coverage did not extend to injury caused by his father. We interpret the policy consistently. If R.L.H. Ill had coverage, he was excluded from coverage for injury inflicted by a family member.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
327 F. App'x 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rlh-v-united-services-automobile-assn-ca9-2009.