R.L.H. v. State

658 So. 2d 661, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8281, 1995 WL 453992
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 2, 1995
DocketNo. 95-295
StatusPublished

This text of 658 So. 2d 661 (R.L.H. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.L.H. v. State, 658 So. 2d 661, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8281, 1995 WL 453992 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

R.L.H., a juvenile, seeks reversal of an order denying his motion to suppress evidence. We reverse. The officer did not have probable cause to seize the manila envelope on the mere belief that the envelope contained marijuana. The record reveals no testimony establishing that the officer arrested R.L.H. at a “nareotics-transaction site[] where the type of container seized was utilized as a principal means to convey narcotics.” P.L.R. v. State, 455 So.2d 368, 366 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1220, 105 S.Ct. 1206, 84 L.Ed.2d 349 (1985). The trial court erred in denying the suppression motion.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greenbaum v. Firestone
455 So. 2d 368 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
658 So. 2d 661, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8281, 1995 WL 453992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rlh-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.