RKO-Stanley Warner Theatres, Inc. v. Shore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

RKO-Stanley Warner Theatres, Inc. v. Shore

41 A.D.2d 730, 341 N.Y.S.2d 654, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4869

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 1973

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 41 A.D.2d 730 (RKO-Stanley Warner Theatres, Inc. v. Shore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

RKO-Stanley Warner Theatres, Inc. v. Shore, 41 A.D.2d 730, 341 N.Y.S.2d 654, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 7, 1972, insofar as it grants summary judgment to plaintiff against appellant, Sig Shore, and the judgment entered thereon, on September 21, 1972, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion for summary judgment against defendant, Sig Shore, denied; the judgment against defendant, Sig Shore, vacated, without costs and without disbursements. Plaintiff predicates its claim against appellant on the basis of an agreement ¡dated August 11, 1971, which plaintiff asserts Shore signed as a principal. However, Shore, in opposition to the motion for summary judgment, avers that he was not individually a party to the contract and that his signature thereto was solely in - a representative capacity for defendants Plaza Pictures and Plaza International Corp. The document itself is inconclusive. The record presents a triable issue as to the capacity in which Shore was acting in signing the contract. That issue cannot be disposed of in summary fashion. The motion for summary judgment as agáinst appellant Shore should, therefore, have been denied. Concur — Markewieh, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Murphy and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 7, 1972, insofar as it grants summary judgment to plaintiff against appellant, Sig Shore, and the judgment entered thereon, on September 21, 1972, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion for summary judgment against defendant, Sig Shore, denied; the judgment against defendant, Sig Shore, vacated, without costs and without disbursements. Plaintiff predicates its claim against appellant on the basis of an agreement ¡dated August 11, 1971, which plaintiff asserts Shore signed as a principal. However, Shore, in opposition to the motion for summary judgment, avers that he was not individually a party to the contract and that his signature thereto was solely in - a representative capacity for defendants Plaza Pictures and Plaza International Corp. The document itself is inconclusive. The record presents a triable issue as to the capacity in which Shore was acting in signing the contract. That issue cannot be disposed of in summary fashion. The motion for summary judgment as agáinst appellant Shore should, therefore, have been denied. Concur — Markewieh, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Murphy and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.2d 730, 341 N.Y.S.2d 654, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rko-stanley-warner-theatres-inc-v-shore-nyappdiv-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack