Rjrn Holdings, LLC v. Ditech Fin. LLC
This text of Rjrn Holdings, LLC v. Ditech Fin. LLC (Rjrn Holdings, LLC v. Ditech Fin. LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RJRN HOLDINGS, LLC, A DOMESTIC No. 76442 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Appellant, vs. DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, F/K/A GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC, A FOREIGN LIMITED LIABILITY FILED COMPANY, Respondent. FEB 2 6 2019 ELIZABETH k BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
DEPUTY CLE RXO
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in a foreclosure action. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Ronald J. Israel, Judge. Counsel for respondent has filed a notice informing this court that respondent and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries have filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The filing of a bankruptcy petition operates to. stay, automatically, the "continuation" of any "judicial . . . action . . . against the debtor." 1.1 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1). An appeal, for purposes of the automatic stay, is considered a continuation of the action in the trial court. Consequently, an appeal is automatically stayed if the debtor was the defendant in the underlying trial court action. See Ingersoll-Rand Fin. Corp. v. Miller Mining Co., 817 F.2d 1424 (9th Cir. 1987). It appears that respondent was a defendant below.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I94Th 41210' -08(96 Therefore, this appeal is stayed pursuant to the automatic stay provisions of federal bankruptcy law. Given the applicability of the automatic stay, this appeal may linger indefinitely on this court's docket pending final resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings. Accordingly, judicial efficiency will be best served if this appeal is dismissed without prejudice. Because a dismissal without prejudice will not require this court to reach the merits of this appeal and is not inconsistent with the primary purposes of the bankruptcy stay—to provide protection for debtors and creditors—this court further concludes that such dismissal will not violate the bankruptcy stay.' See Indep. Union of Flight Attendants u. Pan Ant. World Airways, Inc., 966 F.2d 457, 459 (9th Cir. 1992) (holding that the automatic stay does not preclude dismissal of an appeal so long as dismissal is "consistent with the purpose of [11 U.S.C. §362(a)"]); Dean v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 72 F.3d 754, 755 (9th Cir. 1995) (holding that a post-bankruptcy petition dismissal will violate the automatic stay "where a decision to dismiss requires the court to first consider other issues presented by or related to the underlying case"). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant's right to move for reinstatement of this appeal upon
'The automatic stay provides a debtor "with protection against hungry creditors" and gives it a 'breathing spell from its creditors" by stopping all collection efforts. Dean v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 72 F.3d 754, 755 (9th Cir. 1995) (internal quotation marks omitted). Further, it "assures creditors that the debtor's other creditors are not racing to various courthouses to pursue independent remedies to drain the debtor's assets." Id. at 755-56.
(0) 194M Ze either the lifting of the bankruptcy stay or final resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings, if appellant deems such a motion appropriate at that time. 2 It is so ORDERED.
Cadish
Cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge The Law Office of Mike Beede, PLLC Wolfe & Wyman LLP Fennemore Craig P.C./Reno Eighth District Court Clerk
2Any such motion to reinstate the appeal must be filed within 60 days of any order lifting the stay or concluding the bankruptcy proceedings. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A e 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rjrn Holdings, LLC v. Ditech Fin. LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rjrn-holdings-llc-v-ditech-fin-llc-nev-2019.