RJ v. Guardian Ad Litem Program
This text of 993 So. 2d 176 (RJ v. Guardian Ad Litem Program) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
R.J., Father of D.J., a Child, et al., Appellant,
v.
GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Carl S. New, Ocala, for Appellant, R.J.
Susan W. Fox, of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tampa, and Michael H. Hopkins, Wildwood, for Appellant Department of Children and Families.
Wendie Michelle Cooper, Orlando, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
R.J. and the Department of Children and Families filed a notice of appeal seeking *177 to challenge a non-final order changing the placement of R.J.'s son. Because there is no rule authorizing the direct appeal of this type of non-final order in a termination of parental rights case, see Guardian Ad Litem Program v. Department of Children and Families, 972 So.2d 871 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), we treat the matter as a certiorari proceeding. In this case, the trial court found that the placement would be in the child's best interest, see section 39.522(1), Florida Statutes (2007), and the evidence supports the trial court's factual findings. Accordingly, we deny certiorari.
DENIED.
PALMER, C.J., LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
993 So. 2d 176, 2008 WL 4753731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rj-v-guardian-ad-litem-program-fladistctapp-2008.