R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Thibault
This text of 148 So. 3d 168 (R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Thibault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm all points raised on appeal. We write only to confirm our position that appellant’s proposed jury instruction on the statute of repose was properly denied. See Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Buchanan, — So.3d — (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Hiott, 129 So.3d 473, 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). In so hold-[169]*169mg, as we did in Buchanan, we certify conflict with Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Hess, 95 So.3d 254 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), rev. granted, 137 So.3d 1020 (Fla.2013) (table).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 So. 3d 168, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16750, 2014 WL 5100182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rj-reynolds-tobacco-co-v-thibault-fladistctapp-2014.