R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Sikes
This text of 141 So. 3d 262 (R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Sikes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company appeals the final judgment for plaintiff Janice L. Sikes, the personal representative of the estate of Jimmie Wayne Sikes. We affirm on all issues. But following R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Hiott, 129 So.3d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), we certify conflict with the Fourth District’s decision in Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Hess, 95 So.3d 254 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), rev. denied, 117 So.3d 412 (Fla.2013), on the issue of whether the trial court reversibly erred by denying Reynolds’ requested jury instruction on the statute of repose, section 95.031(2), Florida Statutes.
AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 So. 3d 262, 2014 WL 3295021, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rj-reynolds-tobacco-co-v-sikes-fladistctapp-2014.