R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Grossman

247 So. 3d 25
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Grossman. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 50
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 11, 2018·No. No. 4D13–3949·Published

Opinion

Damoorgian, J.

This matter is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of Florida. In a decision rendered on January 4, 2017, we reversed the final judgment and remanded with instructions for the trial court to reduce the plaintiff's damages by the percentage of fault that the jury attributed to Mrs. Grossman based on our then-binding precedent in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Schoeff , 178 So.3d 487, 488 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). The Florida Supreme Court thereafter *26quashed our Schoeff decision and held that "the comparative fault statute does not apply to Engle progeny cases in which the jury finds for the plaintiff on the intentional tort claims." Schoeff v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. , 232 So.3d 294, 304 (Fla. 2017). As a result, our decision in the instant case was also quashed. In accordance with the supreme court's mandate, we affirm the final judgment and remand for reinstatement of the entire amount of damages found by the jury.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

Conner, J., and Moyle, Paul O., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Grossman, 247 So. 3d 25 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

247 So. 3d 25 (R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Grossman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related