R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Ellis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Ellis

152 So. 3d 125, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19695, 2014 WL 6789911

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 3, 2014

DocketNo. 1D14-3796

StatusPublished

This text of 152 So. 3d 125 (R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Ellis, 152 So. 3d 125, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19695, 2014 WL 6789911 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. Petitioner seeks certiorari review of the circuit court’s August 19, 20Í4, Order Denying Defendant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company’s Motion to Quash Subpoena of Dr. James N. Figlar. Although the ruling is now moot, we address the petition because it involves an issue that is capable of repetition yet evading review. See Kelley v. Rice, 800 So.2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). We conclude, however, that petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the challenged ruling results in irreparable harm. See e.g., Alcon Const. Co., Inc. v. Williams, 12 So.3d 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Mariner Health v. Griffith, 898 So.2d 982, 984 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. Petitioner seeks certiorari review of the circuit court’s August 19, 20Í4, Order Denying Defendant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company’s Motion to Quash Subpoena of Dr. James N. Figlar. Although the ruling is now moot, we address the petition because it involves an issue that is capable of repetition yet evading review. See Kelley v. Rice, 800 So.2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). We conclude, however, that petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the challenged ruling results in irreparable harm. See e.g., Alcon Const. Co., Inc. v. Williams, 12 So.3d 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Mariner Health v. Griffith, 898 So.2d 982, 984 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 So. 3d 125, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19695, 2014 WL 6789911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rj-reynolds-tobacco-co-v-ellis-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack