R.J. Reynolds Company v. Dion

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 8, 2017
Docket2D16-3632
StatusPublished

This text of R.J. Reynolds Company v. Dion (R.J. Reynolds Company v. Dion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.J. Reynolds Company v. Dion, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO ) COMPANY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-3632 ) GEORGE J. DION, as personal ) representative of the Estate of Marion ) T. Dion, deceased, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed November 8, 2017.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Diana L. Moreland, Judge.

Marie A. Borland and Troy A. Fuhrman of Hill Ward Henderson, Tampa; Charles R.A. Morse of Jones Day, New York, New York; Benjamin M. Flowers, of Jones Day, Columbus, Ohio; and Jason T. Burnette of Jones Day, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellant.

David J. Sales and Daniel R. Hoffman of David J. Sales, P.A., Jupiter; and William J. Wichmann of William J. Wichmann, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee. PER CURIAM.

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company appeals from a final judgment following

a jury trial in this Engle1-progeny tobacco litigation case. We affirm the final judgment in

all respects. As we did in Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Boatright, 217 So. 3d 166 (Fla. 2d

DCA 2017), we certify conflict with R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Schoeff, 178 So. 3d

487 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), review granted, No. SC15-2233 (Fla. May 26, 2016), on R.J.

Reynolds’s argument pertaining to comparative fault. We also note that R.J. Reynolds

seeks to preserve for further review its federal preemption and due process arguments,

both of which have previously been rejected. See Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas,

110 So. 3d 419, 430-31 (Fla. 2013); Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Lourie, 198 So. 3d 975,

977-79 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016), review denied, No. SC16-1629 (Fla. June 19, 2017),

petition for cert. filed, No. 17-401 (Sept. 15, 2017).

VILLANTI, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

1 See Engle v. Liggett Grp., Inc., 945 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 2006).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.
945 So. 2d 1246 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Lourie
198 So. 3d 975 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Boatright
217 So. 3d 166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas
110 So. 3d 419 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
R.J. Reynolds Company v. Dion, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rj-reynolds-company-v-dion-fladistctapp-2017.